i'm cooking the veggies and valuing myself! (
themeletor) wrote2005-06-21 01:14 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Hullo, time for the Most Retarded Question Ever...
Major brainfart over here, liek whoah. So, humor me if you please, and...
can a lieutenant have seniority aboard a ship yet still be younger than his junior officer(s)? not saying he's at the top of the ladder, just... a few rungs up. and fragmentationally (oh that is SO a word; shut up) younger than ... the rungs beneath him.
Ee?
can a lieutenant have seniority aboard a ship yet still be younger than his junior officer(s)? not saying he's at the top of the ladder, just... a few rungs up. and fragmentationally (oh that is SO a word; shut up) younger than ... the rungs beneath him.
Ee?
no subject
no subject
*phew* I shall wait to kick myself until after writing.
no subject
no subject
.::hides in rock::.
but my question was ... ah, it's answered anyway. may or may not eat this post, as it's now unnecessary.
no subject
Or at least that's what I've learned from reading Hornblower and such. They're supposed to be historically accurate!
no subject
no subject
no subject
So a 25 year old who'd passed his exams at 18 (the youngest most of them could manage it, since you needed to have been at sea 6 years before you could even try) could have seniority over a 30 year old didn't pass his until he was 24.
no subject
(what I did find, actually, was that the usual rule was that one could not go for examination until nineteen, but, yanno, the 'appears to be' excuse was at times employed if one had friends in high, brocade-y places)
no subject
no subject
no subject
right, PS7. soon as I get home from chauffering.