Fomg.
Whoever said period PotC was messy / dull / dreadful to do? LIED.
Just set it in 1692, is all.
.::falls over::.
You'll have to excuse me; I'm in the throes of research adrenaline.
[ETA: YES! WorldBookOnline's research libraries are back!]
Whoever said period PotC was messy / dull / dreadful to do? LIED.
Just set it in 1692, is all.
.::falls over::.
You'll have to excuse me; I'm in the throes of research adrenaline.
[ETA: YES! WorldBookOnline's research libraries are back!]
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 12:23 pm (UTC)And yeah, PotC 'verse is fun for that freedom from detail-madness, and that's a great, fun thing. Lovely to take advantage of. It's beautiful, because a writer has that option, to completely, as you said, cherrypick, and there's no stigma for it because DUDE, there are zombies.
As for myself, there are times I just want to reconcile PotC, historically, for my own obsessive intentions. So I decided to do that.
But I'm looking forward to watching you Explain It All. :)
Ohhh, I shall.
(though if PotC2&3 somehow break it, I'll practice Studious Non-Attention)