Fomg.
Whoever said period PotC was messy / dull / dreadful to do? LIED.
Just set it in 1692, is all.
.::falls over::.
You'll have to excuse me; I'm in the throes of research adrenaline.
[ETA: YES! WorldBookOnline's research libraries are back!]
Whoever said period PotC was messy / dull / dreadful to do? LIED.
Just set it in 1692, is all.
.::falls over::.
You'll have to excuse me; I'm in the throes of research adrenaline.
[ETA: YES! WorldBookOnline's research libraries are back!]
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 10:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 11:08 am (UTC)It's trying to make all the anachronistic bits fit into -one- historical period that'll drive you 'round the twist.
Which is why I don't try. :-)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 11:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-10 11:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-11 03:54 am (UTC)Nothing wrong with being excited about PotC research, I share your excitement! :)