themeletor: close-up of a cupcake in the grass against a blue sky (gofdhnoiship)
[personal profile] themeletor
Fomg.

Whoever said period PotC was messy / dull / dreadful to do? LIED.

Just set it in 1692, is all.

.::falls over::.

You'll have to excuse me; I'm in the throes of research adrenaline.

[ETA: YES! WorldBookOnline's research libraries are back!]

(no subject)

Date: 2005-05-10 11:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gryphons-lair.livejournal.com
Well, yes, you can retcon anything, if you try hard enough.

The Dauntless, for example. She's a 100-gun, 3-gundeck ship of a type that didn't exist in -any- country's navy until the late 1700s. So, obviously, in your 1692, she's a bleeding-edge experimental prototype sent to the Caribbean for try-outs, because the Spaniards and French are less likely to find out about her there and copy her.

Right? *G*

(no subject)

Date: 2005-05-10 12:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meletor-et-al.livejournal.com
She's a 100-gun, 3-gundeck ship of a type that didn't exist in -any- country's navy until the late 1700s.

Ah-ah-ah! That's not correct! Well, valiantly close, but, sneakily, no cigar. HMS Sovereign of the Seas (http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/ships/html/sh_086000_hmssovereign.htm), for example. The revival of the three-decker was in 1795, true, and that's where we find the three-decker as we know her "now" -- read: the Victory -- but there was an entire period of them before that. They were just crap at sailing, really -- too poorly proportioned & weighted -- and vanished as a build, thus, for a good few decades before their valliant return.

The Dauntless has other issues, like, why's she in the West Indies? Finding pirates? When there are, like, less than a hanful left? Hmmmm? *eyebrow waggle*

(no subject)

Date: 2005-05-10 12:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gryphons-lair.livejournal.com
Hmm... full points for that one. I'd never heard of that ship before.

My take on the POTC universe is that it's a fun place that's obviously not our timeline (undead pirate monkeys, and all that) and in that timeline the earthquake hasn't happened yet, and go on happily cherrypicking the bits of our-world history I want to use and ignoring the ones I don't. 'Cause if I wanted to do excruciatingly historically accurate British Navy fic? I'd be writing Hornblower.

But I'm looking forward to watching you Explain It All. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-05-10 12:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meletor-et-al.livejournal.com
Ok, actually, I think I lied. It was 1775, the revival of the three-decker. Oooops.

And yeah, PotC 'verse is fun for that freedom from detail-madness, and that's a great, fun thing. Lovely to take advantage of. It's beautiful, because a writer has that option, to completely, as you said, cherrypick, and there's no stigma for it because DUDE, there are zombies.

As for myself, there are times I just want to reconcile PotC, historically, for my own obsessive intentions. So I decided to do that.

But I'm looking forward to watching you Explain It All. :)

Ohhh, I shall.
(though if PotC2&3 somehow break it, I'll practice Studious Non-Attention)

Profile

themeletor: close-up of a cupcake in the grass against a blue sky (Default)
i'm cooking the veggies and valuing myself!

December 2011

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 01:46 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios